So what is involved in battening down our borders, learning our language, and cultivating our culture, so that we might ensure our sovereign survival?   There's actually quite a lot to consider and construct to accomplish these most important goals.  However, each and every consideration and construct are simple and basic and shall not be difficult to do, as they are concepts that were, at one time in America, implemented into action on a daily basis as an inherent matter of course.  There should be enough of that still existent in America and innately ingrained in Americans, so that resuming those policies and practices should be intellectually instinctual. 
    I've longed advocated "The Brownsville to San Diego Fences and Trench Project."  However, a flaw has been realized.  It must be "The El Paso to San Diego Fences and Trench Project."  As we would have to construct any border barrier well on our side of the actual, legal, surveyed, internationally recognized border, we can't fence off the wildlife and domestic herds from the Rio Grande.    So, along the Texas Mexico border, we should do as Mexico does with its southern border:  Militarize it as an active combat zone so that every inch is protected against invasion and encroachment.    Strengthen The Border Patrol in every way possible, utilize The Minutemen and other such citizens' volunteer organizations,  train various National Guard units  in the  practice of border security , assign Coast Guard craft to patrol the river, and redeploy  active troops from areas around the globe like Germany and South Korea.  (Of course, the Korean withdrawal has to be done in a very specific manner, and that's a whole other issue.)  That should be sufficient manpower and materiel to employ overt, "eyes on" observation and immediate interdiction at every point along that river.  Such immediacy and dense deployment would not be necessary along the fences and trench, as any encroachment would be detected at its outset and would be defeated  before its completion. This would be done by U.S. military and/or paramilitary forces posted or dispatched near enough to respond with sufficient strength and speed to stop it and to stop it with extreme prejudice where and when necessary.  And the extreme prejudice policy will be implemented from Brownsville to San Diego.
       Of course, all of this proposed border security would not be necessary, at least relative to the "undocumented workers", if policies in place inside the country were replaced by policies that would discourage and disallow such practices as working with falsified social security numbers,  obtaining educations, medical care and other social services at the taxpayers'  expense, and sending twenty billion dollars to Mexico each year to prop up its ungodly corrupt government.  This could be largely accomplished with a few obvious actions.  Overrule on appeal and impeach Clinton and Carter appointed federal judges who insist on legislating from the bench on laws lawfully passed by duly elected representative bodies and ballot initiatives.  Punitively penalize and punish employers, landlords,  financial institutions, and others who knowingly conduct business with illegal aliens that should not be conducted with illegal aliens.  Under asset forfeiture rules, seize the illegal aliens' money before they can send it over the border.  And cease and desist from misinterpreting the fourteenth amendment, so as to put an end to this stupid anchor baby phenomenon.  Do those things, and the illegals already here would self deport and those on their way would turn back before they arrived.  Then, we could concentrate on interdicting Islamofascists, which is, according to one deranged, most probably Democrap Sector Chief in Texas, the sole responsibility of The Border Patrol.  And let's also somehow remind President Calderon that Mexico DOES end at its borders, just as every sovereign nation ends at its borders.
           English is the language of the land whether you like it or not.  Whether or not it is a violation of that mid nineteenth century treaty, it has been the language of the land that far back and beyond.  Whether or not it is only because the evil, Anglo Caucasoid explorers, pioneers, and settlers forced it on the other inhabitants, it is the language of the land because it is the law of the land.  English is the language of business, science, aviation, and diplomacy.  Among the UN's six official languages and two working languages, English is, in practicality, the sole working language at the UN.  English is the global lingua franca. 
      There are some western Mongoloids and a lot of Hispanic Mullatoids from south of the border who proclaim that Spanish should be the language of the land, as the land should be theirs as as it was their ancestors'.  Of course, their ancestors surrendered and sold the land to our ancestors, thus making moot this demand for sovereign transfer of territory.  These ignorant, uneducated, imbecilic reconquistadors haven't learned so much as their own history, so maybe they're incapable of learning a language as lovely and complex as English.  That  would be a good reason for them to remain south of The Rio Grande and The Gasden Purchase.  There, they can curse the Caucasoids of America in what they think is their ancestral tongue of Spanish, which is, of course, a language forced upon their ancestors in their homelands of Central and South America by Caucasoid Conquistadors unrelated to the Caucasoids who began and built the United States.         
      It is also the law in America, that to be a citizen, one has to be proficient in English.  And since it is the law to be a citizen in order to vote, why do we need ballots in varied languages?  But that's another issue.  What does it mean to be proficient in English?  Forget about all the illegals and others in this country who know English as only a barely understood second or third language, if at all.  Our government schools are graduating citizen idiots whose families have been in America for generations who can barely scratch out their own names with a crayon and couldn't correctly construct a conversational sentence if their lives depended on it.  I want more than the use of English; I want proper usage of English.  I want to hear "How do you do?"  or "Hello" rather than "Whuzzzzup!?!" or "Que pasa?"  At least give me "What's up?" or "What's happening?"  There are a million examples like that, but that comes primarily from the degradation of our culture, which is also another issue that we'll ponder in a moment.  And I want insipid scholars, idiotic intellectuals, and supposedly educated informers and entertainers to learn the difference between "was" and "were"  and "who" and "whom."  I want people to say "isn't", "wasn't", "doesn't" and "hasn't", rather than "idn't, wudn't, dudn't, hadn't".  And I want people to know that it is only acceptable to use the verb "ain't" only in conjunction with the pronoun "I".
     Again, like it or not, this is a culture of capitalistic Caucasoid Christo-Judaists.  Does that mean that members of other racial heritages are not welcome to contribute to the greatness of America?  No.  But it does mean that they do adapt  Caucasoidal inquisitiveness and imagination, work ethic and sense of individualistic  rights and responsibilities that have made America the best nation state in history, rather than maintaining instinctual ignorances and tribal turbulence, so as to convolute America's greatness.  Does that mean that peaceable practitioners of other religious belief systems are not free to reside and worship here?  No.  But it does mean that they accept that the cultural underpinning of our country's legal and social systems are based in Biblical teachings.  The Founders screwed 21st century Americans by miswording the freedom of religion clause of the first amendment.  They were, without doubt, the most brilliant and bravest humans in history.  But even they couldn't foresee two centuries into the future.  Instead of  "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", it should read, "The right of every individual to peaceably practice any belief system shall not be infringed."  That would make the soon coming necessity of dealing with American mosques and the Islamoburghs around the country interpretatively easier.  Does it mean that commercialists of other economic systems are unwelcome in America?  Well, yes, on that one, it does.  Those people would be some form of socialists or fascists, and we don't need or want that.  There are two lessons that I have learned about capitalism. The first one is, "The only thing wrong with capitalism is capitalists." That should be "some" capitalists, because not all capitalists have no concern beyond the bottom line and avaricious  self enrichment.  The second lesson is, "Capitalism is the worst, evilest, most repressive, oppressive, slavish, soul destroying economic system ever devised, except, of course, for everything else".